Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty

452Citations
Citations of this article
335Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Benefits of a direct anterior approach (DAA) versus a posterior-lateral (PA) approach to THA were assessed in a single-surgeon, IRB-approved, prospective, randomized clinical study. Subjects (43 DAA and 44 PA) were evaluated at 6. weeks, and 3, 6 and 12. months. The primary end point was ability to climb stairs normally and walk unlimited at each time point. Secondary end points included assessment by several outcome instruments. DAA subjects performed better during the immediate post-operative period; they had lower VAS pain scores on the first post-operative day, more subjects climbing stairs normally and walking unlimited at 6. weeks, and higher HOOS Symptoms scores at 3. months. There were no significant differences between groups at later time points. Findings confirm previous reports of benefits of DAA versus PA in early post-operative phases. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barrett, W. P., Turner, S. E., & Leopold, J. P. (2013). Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 28(9), 1634–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free