A Review of Archival Auditing Research

  • DeFond M
  • Zhang J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We define higher audit quality as greater assurance of high financial reporting quality. Researchers use many proxies for audit quality, with little guidance on choosing among them. We provide a framework for systematically evaluating their unique strengths and weaknesses. Because it is inextricably intertwined with financial reporting quality, audit quality also depends on firms’ innate characteristics and financial reporting systems. Our review of the models commonly used to disentangle these constructs suggests the need for better conceptual guidance. Finally, we urge more research on the role of auditor and client competency in driving audit quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2411228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free