Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy

356Citations
Citations of this article
444Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Building on its high spatial resolution, deep penetration depth and excellent image contrast, 3D photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) has grown tremendously since its first publication in 2005. Integrating optical excitation and acoustic detection, PAM has broken through both the optical diffusion and optical diffraction limits. PAM has 100% relative sensitivity to optical absorption (i.e., a given percentage change in the optical absorption coefficient yields the same percentage change in the photoacoustic amplitude), and its ultimate detection sensitivity is limited only by thermal noise. Focusing on the engineering aspects of PAM, this Review discusses the detection sensitivity of PAM, compares the detection efficiency of different PAM designs, and summarizes the imaging performance of various endogenous and exogenous contrast agents. It then describes representative PAM applications with high detection sensitivity, and outlines paths to further improvement. © 2014 Elsevier GmbH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yao, J., & Wang, L. V. (2014). Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. Elsevier GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free