A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection

ISSN: 10450823
10.5kCitations
Citations of this article
7.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We review accuracy estimation methods and compare the two most common methods cross validation and bootstrap Recent experimental results on artificial data and theoretical re cults m restricted settings have shown that for selecting a good classifier from a set of classifiers (model selection), ten-fold cross-validation may be better than the more expensive ka\p one-out cross-validation We report on a large scale experiment-over half a million runs of C4 5 and a Naive-Bayes algorithm-loestimale the effects of different parameters on these al gonthms on real-world datascts For cross validation we vary the number of folds and whether the folds arc stratified or not, for bootstrap, we vary the number of bootstrap samples Our results indicate that for real-word datasets similar to ours, The best method lo use for model selection is ten fold stratified cross validation even if computation power allows using more folds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kohavi, R. (1995). A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1137–1143). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free