Journal article

Risk aversion and physical prowess: Prediction, choice and bias

Ball S, Eckel C, Heracleous M ...see all

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 41, issue 3 (2010) pp. 167-193

  • 44

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 26

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

This paper reports on experiments where individuals are asked to make risky decisions for themselves, and to predict the risky decisions of others. Prior research shows that people predict women to be more risk averse than men, a result we confirm. We investigate whether differences in physical prowess underlie actual and perceived gender differences, a hypothesis suggested by both evolutionary and economic theories. Overall we find that perceptions of others risk attitudes reflect stereotypes about gender and strength but tend to exaggerate the underlying relationships. Physically stronger and taller people and those perceived as attractive are predicted to be more risk tolerant, while women are perceived to be more risk averse. The impact of gender and physical prowess measures on actual gamble choices is much weaker. Sources of prediction bias are examined, showing that specific characteristics of the target and predictor lead to systematic over-prediction or under-prediction of risk aversion.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Experiment
  • Gender
  • Physical risk
  • Risk aversion
  • Stereotyping

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free